The Denver Post
Bryant will be on camera when he enters plea
Friday, May 07, 2004 - The judge in the Kobe Bryant sex-assault case today The arraignment will occur at some point during a three-day hearing that begins Monday.
“There has been no showing of how any of his testimony would assist a jury,” prosecutors said in arguing against all “expert” opinions on the issue by the defense.
Defense attorneys did not immediately return a call.
Bryant, 25, has said he had consensual sex with the woman last summer. The Los Angeles Lakers star faces four years to life in prison or 20 years to life on probation if convicted of felony sexual assault.
Prosecutors said if state District Judge Terry Ruckriegle determines Ragle’s testimony is relevant, they want a hearing to determine if Ragle can be qualified as an expert.
Click here for an interactive presentation on Kobe Bryant's career.
Click here for an
archive of court documents in the People v. Bryant case.
Click here for The
Denver Post's graphic on the events of June 30.
Click here for the 9NEWS archive on
the case.
Click here for the CourtTV archive on the
case.
During Simpson’s 1995 murder trial, Ragle said the Los Angeles police investigation was substandard and that the department ignored proper procedures for collecting evidence from the scene where Nicole Brown Simpson and friend Ronald Goldman.
The former Orange County sheriff’s forensics expert acknowledged, however, that he had not been to a crime scene since he retired in 1989. He later started a consulting business and testified as an expert witness in about 1,000 criminal cases. It was unclear whether the business is still operating.
Larry Pozner, former president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said previous testimony suggests the investigation in Bryant’s hotel room might have been botched.
Investigators testified during Bryant’s preliminary hearing that the woman had used towels in the bathroom.
“And then the cops didn’t search the bathroom. That alone struck me as shoddy crime-scene work and I don’t remember them taking carpet samples or chair samples,” Pozner said. “It struck me as the amateur hour. When you search a crime scene you take everything that might be of evidentiary significance.” |